Skip to Content

The Meaning of Life: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives

March 12, 2025 by
The Meaning of Life: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives
Dr. Daniel Zeiss

The Meaning of Life: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives

Philosophical Views

​Philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle (depicted above) have long debated the purpose and highest good of life. Philosophical perspectives on life’s meaning rely on human reasoning, examining ideals, values, and purpose from a human-centric or logical standpoint. Different schools of philosophy offer diverse answers – from the idea that we create our own meaning, to the notion that no meaning exists, to views that meaning is found in happiness or virtue. Below are some major philosophical positions regarding the meaning of life:  

Existentialism  

​Existentialism holds that life has no predetermined meaning – instead, each individual creates their own meaning and purpose. As Jean-Paul Sartre put it, “existence precedes essence”, meaning we are not born with a fixed purpose. We are free and responsible for defining our life’s value through our choices and actions (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). Existentialists emphasize personal freedom, authenticity, and decision as the core of a meaningful life. Because no external authority (such as a deity or society) hands us a purpose, we must confront the anxiety of a purposeless universe and then imbue our own lives with meaning through commitment and action. Figures like Sartre and Camus argued that one must live passionately and sincerely, creating meaning even in an indifferent or absurd world.

Nihilism

​Nihilism is the pessimistic flip side to existentialism. A nihilist view suggests that life is inherently without objective meaning, value, or purpose (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). From this perspective, no moral truths or higher goals exist – any meaning we perceive is an illusion. Friedrich Nietzsche described nihilism as “emptying the world...of meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, and essential value,” a state in which the “highest values devalue themselves”. In the wake of realizing “God is dead” (the loss of belief in any absolute), humanity might face an existential despair or “void” of meaning. Some philosophers (like Nietzsche himself or Albert Camus) have grappled with how to respond to this void. Camus acknowledged the “absurdity” of seeking meaning in a meaningless world, yet he famously suggested we can rebel against absurdity – living with defiance, compassion, and integrity even without ultimate purpose. Nihilism, in summary, claims there is no intrinsic meaning to life, and any search for one is ultimately futile.  

Humanism

​​Humanism, especially secular humanism, finds meaning within human life itself rather than in any supernatural realm. Humanist thought emphasizes human values, reason, and compassion. It suggests that people can lead fulfilling, ethical lives that have meaning through personal growth and contributing to humanity. In this view, purpose is self-determined: “People determine human purpose without supernatural influence; it is the human personality...that humanism seeks to develop and fulfill.” Humanism affirms our responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). In practice, this means humanists often find meaning through pursuits like improving society, fostering relationships, creativity, and knowledge. There is faith in human potential and dignity – for example, striving for happiness and well-being for oneself and others is seen as meaningful. As one humanist statement puts it, “Humanism affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity.” Rather than looking to a divine plan, humanists create meaning by helping others, pursuing truth, and enhancing the human condition. 

Utilitarianism

​Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy that connects life’s meaning to the maximization of happiness and reduction of suffering. From a utilitarian The Meaning of Life: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives

​Perspective, the purpose of life is to produce the greatest overall good. The founder of utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, argued that “nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.” Therefore, he defined the meaning of life as the “greatest happiness principle” – in other words, that which brings the most happiness to the greatest number is the highest good. John Stuart Mill and other utilitarians similarly held that a meaningful, moral life is one spent increasing general well-being. In this view, actions (and by extension lives) are evaluated by their consequences for overall happiness. Living a meaningful life means contributing positively to human (and sentient beings’) welfare, and minimizing harm. Notably, this ties life’s meaning to an ethical calculus: a life well-lived is one that leaves people better off (happier, with less misery) than they would have been otherwise (Meaning of life - Wikipedia).

Other Philosophical Perspectives  

​Beyond the above, many other philosophical traditions have weighed in on life’s meaning: - Ancient Greek philosophy: Aristotle taught that the highest goal of life is to achieve eudaimonia, often translated as happiness, flourishing, or well-being. This “highest good” is desirable for its own sake and consists of living a life of virtue and excellence (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). By cultivating virtues (like courage, wisdom, justice, moderation), a person achieves a fulfilled and meaningful life. In Aristotle’s words, “happiness [eudaimonia] is identical with the good life and successful living.” Likewise, the Stoics later argued that living in accordance with nature and reason – accepting fate and practicing virtue – is the true path to meaning. - Absurdism: Often considered a subset of existential thought, absurdism (associated with Albert Camus) contends that the human search for meaning clashes with the indifferent “silence” of the universe. Life may be inherently absurd, but Camus suggested we can still find value through our personal revolt against absurdity – embracing life passionately, helping others, and living authentically even knowing there is no ultimate answer. In The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus famously concludes we must imagine Sisyphus (condemned to repeat a futile task forever) to be happy – a metaphor for creating meaning through perseverance in face of meaninglessness. - Theism (philosophical): Some philosophical viewpoints align with religious ideas, suggesting that if God or a divine realm exists, the meaning of life might be to form a relationship with the divine or fulfill a divine purpose. (This overlaps with theological perspectives, discussed later.) Conversely, naturalist philosophers argue that in a purely natural universe, meaning must be found in natural human experiences – through love, achievement, knowledge, etc., rather than any supernatural plan. - Pragmatism: Pragmatic philosophers focus on the practical consequences of beliefs. A pragmatist might say that the “meaning” of life is not a abstract essence but is found in the activities and goals that work for us – the projects that give us fulfillment and help society. Meaning is something we do or experience rather than an absolute truth to discover. - Personal meaning vs cosmic meaning: Many modern philosophers distinguish between meaning in life (personal significance, what makes an individual life feel worthwhile) and the meaning of life in an ultimate sense. Philosophical consensus generally veers toward the idea that while there may be no single cosmic purpose, individuals can still find meaning in life through relationships, achievements, creativity, and self-expression. This humanistic approach is summed up by the question, “What is the meaning of my life?”, emphasizing subjective meaning over any supposed universal answer.

​In summary, philosophical views on life’s meaning range widely. Some, like existentialists and humanists, stress personal responsibility in creating meaning. Others, like nihilists, deny that any true meaning exists at all. Still others identify happiness, virtue, or love as giving life its value. Philosophy provides a forum for rigorous debate on this question, using reason and reflection to explore what – if anything – makes life meaningful.

Scientific Perspectives  

​​From a scientific standpoint, the question of life’s meaning is often approached differently. Rather than prescribing a purpose, science aims to describe and explain life’s origins, characteristics, and context in the universe. Empirical evidence and theory are used to investigate how life arose and evolved, how consciousness works, and what role life might play cosmically. While science may not identify an inherent “meaning” in a moral or spiritual sense, it offers insight into the mechanisms and significance of life from a factual perspective. Key scientific angles on the meaning of life include evolutionary biology, cosmology, and the study of the mind:

Evolutionary Theory and Life’s Purpose 

​​In biology, one might say the “purpose” of life (in a very basic sense) is to survive and reproduce. Evolutionary theory explains life through natural selection – organisms that are better at surviving and passing on their genes tend to persist. Thus, from a purely biological viewpoint, the closest thing to a built-in goal of life is the propagation of one’s genes and the continuance of the species. Richard Dawkins expressed this famously: “We are survival machines – robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes.” In other words, our behaviors and traits are largely shaped by the imperative of gene survival, not because of conscious meaning but due to natural processes. This view implies no intentional design or higher purpose behind life – life forms exist because their ancestors succeeded in reproducing, not because they were meant to fulfill a cosmic plan (The meaning to life? A Darwinian existentialist has his answers | Aeon Ideas).

​From a Darwinian perspective, then, meaning isn’t something nature provides – it’s something humans may overlay on the facts of life. Evolution can explain how complex life and intelligence emerged, but it doesn’t assign a why. In fact, Darwinian theory can be seen as undercutting traditional ideas of human special significance; it places us as one branch on the tree of life rather than the center of creation. Some argue this “de-centering” implies that any meaning must be created by us, not given from outside. As one writer put it, “Darwinian evolutionary theory shows…there is no eternal future [planned for us]… Rather, we must live life to the full, within the context of – liberated by – our Darwinian-created human nature.” In practical terms, many scientists note that humans evolved social instincts, empathy, and intellect, which allow us to find meaning in family bonds, community, art, knowledge and so on – even if evolution’s objective “goal” was simply gene replication.  

Cosmology and the Role of Life in the Universe

​ Cosmology reveals that we live in an immense, ancient universe, and this perspective can influence how we see life’s meaning. Modern astronomy shows Earth is a tiny planet in a vast cosmos: one of billions of planets, in a galaxy among billions of galaxies. From this vantage, some find that there is no obvious cosmic purpose for humanity – the universe seems to function according to physical laws, without specific regard for creating or nurturing life. As physicist Steven Weinberg once said, “the more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.” This reflects a view that meaning is not written into the stars; the cosmos wasn’t made with us in mind (as far as science can tell).

​ Yet, others take a more positive cosmic view of life’s significance. Notably, astronomer Carl Sagan pointed out that through conscious beings like us, the universe can reflect on itself. “We are a way for the cosmos to know itself,” Sagan wrote ( About this Collection | Finding Our Place in the Cosmos: From Galileo to Sagan and Beyond | Digital Collections | Library of Congress ). In that sense, life (especially intelligent life) has the remarkable role of bringing awareness and meaning to the universe. Without living observers, the vast reaches of space would be silent and meaningless – with observers, there is appreciation, wonder, and inquiry. Some scientists invoke the Anthropic Principle, which notes that the universe’s laws appear finely-tuned to allow life. The weak anthropic principle simply observes that we must find the universe compatible with life, or else we wouldn’t be here to notice. The strong anthropic principle speculates that life (or consciousness) is in some sense central to the universe’s existence or design. While highly debated, these ideas raise profound questions: Is the emergence of life and mind just a lucky accident, or could it have a larger significance in the cosmos? Science doesn’t give a definitive answer, but it provides the context: a universe about 13.8 billion years old, where heavy elements forged in stars made life possible, and where life on Earth began around 3.5+ billion years ago through natural processes.

​ When looking at the sky, the sheer scale of the universe can make human life feel insignificant. Stephen Hawking captured this dual perspective well: “We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet of a very average star. But we can understand the Universe. That makes us something very special.”. In scientific terms, although we occupy no central physical place in the cosmos, our ability to learn about the universe is extraordinary – and perhaps it is within that intellectual and emotional capacity that many find meaning. Simply put, science indicates no external purpose to life, but it shows that life is possible and indeed resilient even in a vast, cold universe. It’s up to us to assign meaning to that existence.  

Consciousness and Mind

​One of the most profound scientific mysteries is consciousness – our capacity for self-awareness and subjective experience. From a scientific perspective, understanding consciousness can inform the question of life’s meaning because meaning is ultimately a concept created by minds. Neurobiology and cognitive science investigate how the brain produces thoughts, feelings, and the sense of self. If consciousness is an emergent property of brain matter, as many scientists believe, then the search for meaning might be seen as a byproduct of evolution. Our brains seek patterns and purpose (perhaps because it had survival value), so humans naturally ask “Why am I here?” even if the universe itself is neutral.

​ Research in psychology and neuroscience sheds light on how humans derive a sense of meaning. For example, studies in positive psychology show that people find life meaningful when they have relationships, goals, and engagement. Biochemically, experiences of purpose and pleasure correlate with neurotransmitters and brain activity in reward circuits (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). From this angle, one could say meaning is a mental state – a feeling of significance – which has identifiable neural correlates. Science can thus examine what conditions foster this state (such as social connection, creativity, helping others) and how it benefits us. Indeed, empirical studies find that having a sense of meaning or purpose is linked to better mental and physical health. In evolutionary terms, this makes sense: believing life has meaning can reduce stress and improve social cohesion, which could enhance survival.  

​ Another scientific consideration is the uniqueness of human consciousness. We appear to be the only species (as far as we know) that reflects on existential questions. This might suggest that “meaning” is not an objective feature of life, but rather a problem created by our complex brains. Our large cerebral cortex allows abstract thought – we can imagine futures, recall distant past events, and conceive of ideals. Along with this comes the awareness of mortality and the desire for significance. Some theorize that religion and philosophy arose as cognitive responses to this awareness. Cognitive science of religion, for instance, proposes that humans are inclined to detect agency and intention (even in nature), contributing to belief in gods or cosmic purpose.

​In summary, the scientific perspective often frames “the meaning of life” as the wrong kind of question – not one that physics or biology can answer in the way they answer “what is life?” or “how does life work?”. Science describes the mechanisms of life (from big bang to biochemistry to brain function) and in doing so it sets the stage within which we create meaning. As one summary puts it, “Scientific contributions focus on describing empirical facts about the universe, exploring the ‘how’ of life,” rather than the “why”. However, science can still inform our search for meaning by illuminating our origins (we are genetically connected to all life on Earth), our nature (we have social, empathetic instincts), and our place in the cosmos (we are made of star-stuff, as Sagan said). Many people find a sense of awe and meaning in scientific discovery itself – the fact that we can understand the laws of nature and contemplate our existence is meaningful to us (Stephen Hawking - We are just an advanced breed of monkeys...). In the words of Stephen Hawking, “But we can understand the Universe. That makes us something very special.” (Quote by Stephen Hawking: “We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a m...”) Thus, while science may not give life a purpose, it provides a rich understanding of life’s context, which is an essential part of any informed discussion about meaning.

Religious and Spiritual Beliefs  

​​Religious and spiritual traditions have long been the primary source of answers to “What is the meaning of life?” for billions of people. Major world religions each offer their own teachings on why we exist, what our purpose is, and how to live a meaningful life. These answers are often grounded in beliefs about the divine, the soul, and an ultimate reality beyond this earthly life. In general, religions provide a transcendent source of meaning – life’s purpose is linked to God (or gods), to cosmic law, or to spiritual liberation. Below we explore insights from some of the major faiths:(File:ReligionSymbol.svg - Wikisource, the free online library) Symbols of major world religions (clockwise from top: Star of David for Judaism, the Arabic “Allah” for Islam, the Dharma Wheel for Buddhism, Om for Hinduism, Yin-Yang for Taoism, and the Cross for Christianity). Each tradition offers a distinctive perspective on life’s purpose and how to achieve it.

 Christianity  

​In Christianity, life’s meaning is fundamentally tied to a relationship with God. Humans are created by God in the image of God, and our ultimate purpose is to love, serve, and be reconciled with God. According to Christian teachings, the meaning of life is to seek salvation – to be saved from sin through the grace of Jesus Christ – and thereby restore our fellowship with God now and in the afterlife (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). As the Bible’s New Testament suggests, God desires humans to “seek Him” and attain eternal life with Him. Key elements of a meaningful life in Christianity include: faith in God, following the teachings of Jesus (such as loving God and neighbor), and fulfilling God’s will in one’s life.

​Because humanity is seen as fallen (sinful) and in need of redemption, Christianity holds that Jesus’s sacrifice and resurrection provide the path to redeeming a life that would otherwise be spiritually “dead.” Thus, finding meaning means accepting Christ’s offer of salvation and living in God’s grace. Many Christian traditions summarize man’s purpose as “to glorify God and enjoy Him forever.” For example, the Reformed Christian catechism famously states: “Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy Him forever.” Living a life that honors God – through worship, moral living, evangelization, and service – is seen as inherently meaningful. In essence, Christianity teaches that we were created out of God’s love, and our meaning is fulfilled when we enter into that love, both by loving God in return and extending love to others. This carries an eternal dimension: the meaningful life leads to Heaven, where one’s communion with God is perfected. Even sufferings and trials in life can have meaning in Christianity, as they may test faith or build character in preparation for an eternal purpose (Romans 8:28 posits that God works all things for good for those who love Him).  

Islam

​In Islam, the meaning of life centers on submission to Allah (God). The very word “Islam” means “submission,” reflecting the core idea that humans are created to worship and serve the one God. According to the Quran, humankind’s ultimate purpose is to worship Allah and to live according to His guidance. A clear statement appears in the Quran: “I (Allah) created not the jinn and mankind except to worship Me.” (Quran 51:56). Worship ( ibadah ) in Islam is a broad concept that includes not only ritual prayers and rites, but also living ethically, seeking justice, and showing gratitude to God. Living a meaningful life in Islam means recognizing the sovereignty of God in all things, and doing one’s duty as outlined by God’s revelations.  

​Muslims believe each person is tested in earthly life ( dunya ) to determine their faith and righteousness. Life is thus seen as a trial (ibtihān) for the soul: following Allah’s commands leads to eternal reward (Paradise), while neglecting them leads to loss (Hell). The Quran repeatedly emphasizes doing good deeds, being patient in adversity, and remembering God as keys to success. As one passage notes, God created death and life “that He might examine which of you is best in deeds”. Therefore, the meaning of life is to prove one’s faith through sincere worship and good actions, earning the pleasure of Allah.

​Islamic teachings also stress surrendering to Allah’s will brings peace and true fulfillment. By following the Five Pillars of Islam – profession of faith, prayer, charity, fasting, and pilgrimage – and living by the moral and legal guidance of the Quran and Hadith, a Muslim aligns their life with its God-given purpose. There is also a strong communal aspect: part of life’s meaning is to establish a just society under God’s law, and to care for others (as seen in the emphasis on charity, Zakat). In summary, Islam teaches that “to worship Allah” is the very reason we exist. Everything from daily prayers to acts of kindness can be part of this worship. A life lived in conscious submission to God – with the hope of reuniting with the Creator in the hereafter – is considered a life of true meaning in Islam.

Hinduism

​Hinduism is a diverse tradition, but it provides a comprehensive framework for the meaning and purpose of life through the concepts of dharma, karma, and moksha. In Hindu thought, every individual (ātman, or soul) is on a spiritual journey across many lifetimes (the cycle of saṁsāra). The ultimate goal of life – and the answer to why we are here – is moksha, which is liberation from the cycle of rebirth and union with the ultimate reality (Brahman). However, before reaching moksha, Hindu philosophy outlines four aims of human life (the Purusharthas): kāma (pleasure), artha (prosperity or success), dharma (righteousness or duty), and moksha (liberation). A balanced, meaningful life in Hinduism typically involves honoring all these goals in appropriate measure, with dharma as a guiding principle.

  • Dharma: This is a central concept meaning one’s duty, morality, and the right way of living. Fulfilling one’s dharma (which can vary based on stage of life, caste, and personal inclination) gives life meaning because it means living in harmony with cosmic order and social responsibility. For example, a student’s dharma is to learn, a householder’s is to raise a family and contribute to society, etc. Acting according to dharma also generates good karma.
  • Karma: The law of karma holds that every action has consequences that affect one’s future (either within this life or future lives). Thus, one thread of meaning is ethical: doing good (dharma) leads to positive outcomes, doing harm leads to suffering. Each life’s circumstances are partly the result of past karma. Living a meaningful life means accumulating good karma by virtuous deeds, thus improving one’s spiritual progress.
  • Moksha: Ultimately, Hindu teachings say the highest meaning of life is to attain spiritual liberation (moksha). This is achieved through self-realization – realizing that one’s true self (Atman) is not separate from the absolute reality (Brahman). In essence, the meaning of life is to awaken to the divine nature of the self and all existence. Various paths (yogas) exist for pursuing this: the path of knowledge (Jnana yoga), of devotion (Bhakti yoga), of selfless action (Karma yoga), etc. When moksha is achieved, the soul is freed from the cycle of birth and death and merges back into the infinite consciousness, which is the ultimate fulfillment of its purpose (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). 

​In practical terms, Hindu traditions encourage individuals to live ethically, pursue knowledge, and worship the divine in whatever form one reveres (e.g. Vishnu, Shiva, Shakti, etc.). By progressing spiritually and performing one’s worldly duties, a person moves closer to the highest goal. Life stages (ashramas) – student, householder, hermit, renunciate – outline a progression where one initially focuses on worldly duties and gradually turns toward spiritual emancipation. A famous Hindu verse from the Upanishads proclaims “Ayam Ātman Brahma” (This soul is Brahman), reflecting the realization that gives life ultimate meaning (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). Thus, Hinduism provides a rich, multi-layered answer: the meaning of life is to fulfill one’s duties with integrity (dharma), enjoy life’s legitimate pleasures, work for prosperity, and ultimately attain liberation (moksha), realizing one’s unity with the divine.

Buddhism

​Buddhism approaches the meaning of life in pragmatic and therapeutic terms: to end suffering (dukkha). The Buddha taught that life as ordinarily lived is pervaded by dissatisfaction and suffering due to craving, ignorance, and attachment. Thus, the purpose of life for Buddhists is to attain enlightenment (nirvana) – a state of liberation from suffering, selfish desire, and the cycle of rebirth. Unlike theistic religions, Buddhism does not posit a creator God or a soul; the focus is on personal spiritual development and insight into the true nature of reality. A meaningful life, in the Buddhist view, is one spent on the path toward awakening, characterized by ethical living, mental cultivation, and wisdom.

​Classical Buddhism encapsulates this in the Four Noble Truths: (1) life in the realm of samsara is ultimately unsatisfactory (truth of suffering), (2) there is a cause of suffering (craving and attachment), (3) there is an end to suffering (nirvana), and (4) there is a path to that end (the Noble Eightfold Path). Therefore, the meaning or goal of life is to understand these truths and follow the Eightfold Path – which includes right understanding, right intention, right speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness, and concentration – in order to uproot the causes of suffering (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). Every teaching and practice in Buddhism (such as meditation, compassion, moral precepts) is oriented toward this liberation.

​ It’s important to note that Buddhism doesn’t talk about “meaning” in the sense of a cosmic purpose. In fact, Buddhist scriptures avoid grand metaphysical speculation and instead ask, “How can we alleviate suffering here and now?” Meaning is found in the practical transformation of one’s life and mind. A person who cultivates virtue (sīla), meditation (samādhi), and wisdom (prajñā) gradually experiences less ignorance and craving, leading to more peace and contentment. The culmination is Nirvana, often described as the ultimate peace – freedom from the compulsions of desire and from the cycle of birth and death (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). Achieving Nirvana is the Buddhist’s ultimate meaning of life: it is the highest happiness and the release from all worldly bondage.

​ In Mahayana Buddhism, there is an added dimension: the ideal of the Bodhisattva, who delays personal final enlightenment to help all other beings attain liberation. This introduces a purpose of universal compassion – one finds meaning in life not just by ending one’s own suffering, but by compassionately aiding others on the path to enlightenment. In summary, Buddhism teaches that life’s meaning is to awaken from delusion. By seeing reality as it truly is (impermanent, without a fixed self, interdependent) and eliminating craving, one can live fully in the present moment and ultimately reach enlightenment. A meaningful Buddhist life is one of mindfulness, ethical conduct, and insight, culminating in Nirvana – the end of suffering and the attainment of unshakeable freedom.

Other Religious/Spiritual Traditions

  • Judaism: As one of the Abrahamic faiths, Judaism shares with Christianity and Islam the idea of a life lived in relationship with God. In Judaism, meaning is found in serving God and obeying His commandments (mitzvot) as given in the Torah. Humans are seen as partners in completing creation – through moral living, pursuing justice, and upholding the covenant between God and Israel, life gains purpose. Some Jewish teachings say our purpose is “to fix the world” (tikkun olam) by spreading righteousness and caring for others. Traditional texts like Ecclesiastes conclude that the whole duty of humanity is to “fear God and keep His commandments.” This devotion to God and ethical monotheism defines a meaningful life in Judaism.
  • Taoism and Confucianism (Chinese traditions): In Taoism (Daoism), life’s meaning is to live in harmony with the Tao, the underlying Way of the universe. Simplicity, naturalness, and non-forcing action (wu wei) are keys to aligning with the Tao. By cultivating inner stillness and compassion, one finds flow and balance, which is the Taoist ideal of a meaningful life. Confucianism, meanwhile, places meaning in fulfilling one’s roles within family and society with virtue (ren) and propriety (li). To Confucius, a meaningful life is one of moral integrity, education, and benevolence, contributing to social harmony. Both traditions are less concerned with an afterlife and more with creating order and virtue in this life.
  • Sikhism: Sikh teachings combine devotion to God with community service. The meaning of life in Sikhism is to remember God (Naam Japna), earn an honest living (Kirat Karo), and share with others (Vand Chakko). By chanting and keeping God in one’s heart, living truthfully, and practicing charity and service (seva), Sikhs aim to break the cycle of rebirth and merge with God. Serving humanity is viewed as serving God, so a life of love, equality, and service is highly meaningful.
  • New Age and Modern Spirituality: Many contemporary spiritual movements focus on personal growth, finding one’s unique purpose or calling, and achieving higher consciousness. People may speak of discovering their “life purpose” through introspection, aligning with the universe’s energy, or following intuitive guidance. Practices like meditation, yoga, or energy healing are used to find deeper meaning beyond material pursuits. These individualized spiritual paths often blend wisdom from older traditions and emphasize that each person’s life has a purpose, often related to learning lessons or helping others, as part of a larger spiritual evolution.
  • Atheism/Agnosticism: While not a religion, it’s worth noting that those who do not follow a religion still find meaning in life in personal ways. An atheist may believe there is no God-given purpose, but they can still have causes or values that give their life significance – such as love for family, contributing to knowledge or art, fighting for justice, or simply experiencing the joys of living. As humanist perspectives (discussed earlier) show, a meaningful secular life might center on human flourishing and ethics without reference to the divine. Agnostics might remain open to spiritual questions, finding meaning in exploration and wonder.

In conclusion, religious and spiritual perspectives provide overarching narratives that imbue life with meaning. Whether it’s doing God’s will, preparing for an eternal life, achieving enlightenment, or harmonizing with a cosmic principle, these traditions anchor the human experience in something larger than the individual. They often offer comfort that life is not random or meaningless – there is an order or plan in which each person has a part. Despite their differences, many religions converge on the idea that living a life of virtue, love, and devotion is what ultimately makes life meaningful.

Comparative Analysis: Commonalities and Differences   

Having examined the philosophical, scientific, and religious viewpoints, we can highlight how they overlap or diverge in addressing the meaning of life. Each perspective approaches the question from a different angle – rational inquiry, empirical observation, or faith and revelation – yet there are some common themes as well as clear distinctions among them: 

Commonalities Across Perspectives     

  • Search for Purpose: All these approaches acknowledge the human desire for purpose and significance. Whether through a god, a personal decision, or an evolutionary explanation, each perspective is answering to the basic human impulse to ask “Why are we here?” In practice, philosophers, scientists, and religious thinkers all grapple with existential questions, even if their methods differ (Religion And Philosophy: Similarities And Differences – OpEd – Eurasia Review). There is a shared recognition that how we live our lives matters – be it morally, personally, or cosmically. 
  • Ethics and Virtue: Interestingly, many perspectives converge on the importance of living a good, ethical life. For religious traditions, this means following divine commandments or exemplifying compassion. For humanists and some philosophers, it means using reason to promote wellbeing and virtue. Even evolutionary science notes that cooperation and altruism have deep roots in our species. Thus, leading a life that benefits others (or at least minimizes harm) is widely seen as meaningful. For example, utilitarianism’s happiness-maximization, Christianity’s love of neighbor, and Buddhism’s compassion all echo the value of goodness.
  • Transcending the Self: Another common thread is the idea that meaning often involves looking beyond oneself. Religions urge devotion to God or service to others; existentialists speak of committing to causes larger than the self; humanists find meaning in contributing to humanity; even scienceinspired views note that being part of the larger cosmos or the flow of life can imbue a sense of meaning. In short, self-centered pleasure alone is rarely seen as truly meaningful – connection to something greater (community, transcendent values, the divine, nature, etc.) is a recurring theme.    
  • Coping with Suffering and Mortality: All perspectives provide ways to face life’s challenges. Nihilism and existentialism squarely face the possibility of meaninglessness and still encourage authenticity or “heroic” living. Religions offer frameworks where suffering has a purpose (a test, a consequence of karma, etc.) or at least an end (salvation, nirvana). Science suggests practical ways to improve life (medicine, psychology of wellbeing). Giving meaning to suffering – finding growth, redemption, or insight through it – is a notable human strategy across traditions.
  • Personal Fulfillment: Most views ultimately imply that a meaningful life is one where an individual feels a sense of fulfillment or wholeness. For Aristotle it was eudaimonia (human flourishing), for Maslow (a psychologist) it might be self-actualization, for a devotee it might be closeness to God, for a scientist perhaps the joy of discovery. There is broad agreement that an individual should strive to realize their potential and find joy or contentment in life (though defined differently: spiritual bliss, inner peace, happiness, etc.). Even nihilists, while denying cosmic meaning, often encourage creating one’s own subjective meaning or embracing freedom as a form of fulfillment.

Key Differences Among Perspectives  

  • Source of Meaning: A fundamental difference is where meaning comes from. Religious views assert an objective meaning bestowed by a higher power or cosmic law (e.g. “to serve God” or “to attain enlightenment” are seen as truths beyond individual opinion). In contrast, secular philosophies like existentialism or humanism see meaning as subjective or constructed – meaning is created by individuals or cultures, not pre-given by the universe (Meaning of life - Wikipedia). Scientific perspectives tend to sidestep the issue of meaning altogether; science doesn’t assign meaning, it only describes facts. As one source notes, “Religion deals with beliefs…concerning the divine or supernatural, while philosophy is concerned with … existence, and ethics.” (Religion And Philosophy: Similarities And Differences – OpEd – Eurasia Review) Science, dealing with empirical data, often views meaning as a human psychological phenomenon rather than an external truth.
  • Method of Knowing: Each perspective relies on different methods to answer the question. Religious answers are based on faith, scripture, and revelation – one trusts sacred texts or spiritual experiences as truth. Philosophical answers use reason, logic, and argumentation, examining the question conceptually from various angles. Scientific answers use observation, hypothesis, and evidence, re-framing the question into measurable terms (like the study of happiness, evolution of behavior, etc.). This leads to differences in certainty and type of answer: religious narratives provide more definitive and comforting answers (grounded in divine plan), whereas philosophy often provides debate and multiple possible answers, and science might say the question is not answerable in a lab (though it can inform related questions).
  • Focus (This World vs. Otherworldly): Religions often extend meaning beyond this life, into an afterlife or spiritual realm. For example, meaning in Christianity or Islam is deeply connected to one’s eternal fate and relationship with the divine beyond death. In Eastern religions, the cycle of rebirth and liberation adds a multi-life dimension to purpose. Philosophical humanism or scientific views are generally focused on this earthly life – meaning is to be found in the here and now (in human experience, society, or understanding the universe). This influences values: a religious person might endure hardship now for heavenly reward, whereas an atheist humanist might emphasize improving the world we have because it’s the only one.  
  • Individual vs. Cosmic Significance: Humanist and existentialist perspectives center meaning on the individual or humanity collectively – meaning is something we generate. This can lead to a plurality of meanings (each person might find their own). Religious perspectives typically claim a universal meaning or purpose for all humans, set by the Creator or by Dharma, etc. Meanwhile, science tends to reduce human significance in a cosmic sense (we’re one species among many in a vast universe). A scientist with a naturalistic outlook might lean toward a nihilistic view that, objectively, human life has no more universal “meaning” than any other natural phenomenon. However, that same person might personally adopt a humanistic ethic to create meaning.
  • Emotional Satisfaction: On a practical level, many people find religious answers more emotionally satisfying because they provide clear purpose and hope (e.g. “God loves you and has a plan for you” or “you will reach enlightenment and escape suffering”). Philosophical answers can be challenging or stark – e.g. “you must create your own meaning in an indifferent universe,” which not everyone finds comforting. Scientific views might be seen as too cold or impersonal by some – knowing we are “starstuff” is awe-inspiring to many, but others might crave a more personal meaning. These differences explain why even in an age of science, religious and spiritual worldviews remain deeply important to many: they address the human yearning for meaning in a direct, narrative, and communal way that pure rationality or empiricism sometimes does not.
  • Role of God or the Transcendent: Perhaps the clearest dividing line is the role of the divine. In religious perspectives, God or ultimate reality defines meaning – life is meaningful because it fulfills God’s purpose or moves one toward the divine. In secular philosophies, meaning must be found without invoking God. For example, an existentialist says life has meaning because we choose values freely, not because a deity gave us destiny. Science, by its methodology, doesn’t include supernatural causes, so it will not refer to God’s purpose (individual scientists, of course, can personally believe in God’s plan, but science as a discipline won’t invoke it). This is a core difference in worldview: a theistic meaning of life vs. an atheistic (or non-theistic) meaning.

​Despite these differences, it’s worth noting that many people blend perspectives. A scientist might also be religious, finding meaning in both understanding the world and in serving God. A person might approach the question philosophically but still participate in spiritual practices. These categories can and do overlap in real human lives.

​In summary, philosophy and religion often ask the “meaning of life” question directly, while science reframes or informs it indirectly. Religions give authoritative answers rooted in faith, philosophies provide critical inquiry and diverse answers, and science offers context and clarity on the processes of life. Yet all three domains contribute pieces to the puzzle. When viewed together, they suggest that the meaning of life may not be a single answer for everyone, but rather a tapestry of insights: a life can be meaningful through love, through understanding, through creation, through service, through faith – aspects appreciated across multiple perspectives. Ultimately, each individual might draw from philosophical reasoning, scientific knowledge, and spiritual intuition to carve out their own sense of meaning in life’s grand adventure.

Conclusion

​Viewed through the lens of David R. Hawkins’ Map of Consciousness, the many perspectives on the meaning of life fall into place as stages in an evolving journey of awareness. Each framework—existentialist, scientific, religious, humanist—corresponds to a level of consciousness with its characteristic worldview and emotional state. Rather than conflicting answers, they are complementary milestones on the path toward higher understanding. Below, we organize these perspectives by Hawkins’ levels of consciousness, showing how each offers meaning appropriate to that stage:

  • Existentialism (Courage & Acceptance) – “Each person creates the essence (meaning) of their life” (Meaning of life - Wikipedia), as existentialist philosophy asserts. This perspective arises when one summons the courage to confront a seemingly absurd or indifferent world and to take personal responsibility for creating meaning. Hawkins identifies Courage (level 200) as the tipping point into true empowerment, where one sees life as challenging but exciting (Levels of Consciousness by David R. Hawkins - Mindfulled | Luka Boenisch). Here the individual overcomes despair and fear by choosing their own values and actions. By the level of Acceptance (~350), one “takes full responsibility for your life” and realizes that “happiness and love are created from within…not obtained from outside”. This inner-directed mindset of freedom and accountability reflects the existential ethos and corresponds to a life-view that is becoming “harmonious” (David R. Hawkins: Tietoisuuden tasoista / Map of Consciousness | Katrina Lumikallio). In short, existentialism fits the consciousness stage where one moves from nihilistic angst into empowered meaning-making through courage and self-honesty.
  • Scientific Rationalism (Reason) – The scientific approach to life’s meaning aligns with the level of Reason (~400), where intellect and understanding predominate. At this stage, emotional turmoil is transcended by rational inquiry. Hawkins notes this is “the level of science and medicine, the level of Einstein and Freud”. A person viewing life at Reason seeks meaning in truth, knowledge, and “meaningful contributions to the world”. The life-view is “meaningful” at this level (David R. Hawkins: Tietoisuuden tasoista / Map of Consciousness | Katrina Lumikallio) (Consciousness Levels Hawkins): existence is rich with purpose when it can be understood and explained. Scientific and philosophical humanists at this stage often find purpose through discovery, innovation, and solving mysteries of the universe. This corresponds to a highly mental consciousness focused on logic, where empirical truth and reason give life its significance. 
  • Humanism and Altruism (Acceptance & Love) – The humanist perspective, which emphasizes compassion, ethics, and the welfare of all, resonates with the higher emotional frequencies of Acceptance (350) and Love (500). At Acceptance, one’s view expands to see humanity with empathy and inclusion: “on the social level [Acceptance is marked] by equality and inclusion”. Secular humanism explicitly rejects any external source of meaning, holding that people determine their own purpose and have “the ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good of humanity”. This reflects Hawkins’ Life-view of “harmonious” at 350, as individuals seek balance and fairness in human relationships. By the time consciousness reaches Love (500), the driving force becomes unconditional care and unity with others. Life’s meaning here centers on benevolence, kindness, and connection – viewing the world as “benign” and compassionate. In Hawkins’ research, crossing into Love means one’s motivation is largely to serve others and spread joy, aligning with the humanistic ideals of empathy and universal brotherhood. Indeed, as one progresses upward, “others’ happiness [becomes] a central motivating force” by level 500, and by 600 one is devoted to the good of all humanity. The humanist framework thus sits within these advanced stages of consciousness where purpose is found in love, social connection, and improving life for everyone.
  • Religious/Spiritual Faith (Multiple Levels up to Peace) – Religious interpretations of life’s meaning span a range of consciousness levels depending on their emphasis. At the mid-levels (around Acceptance and Reason), many traditional religious views provide meaning through belief in a higher power and moral order. For example, Christianity teaches that life’s purpose is to “seek divine salvation through the grace of God” and to cultivate a relationship with the divine. Such a purpose can inspire hope and trust (akin to Neutrality/Willingness, 250–310) and a sense of harmony in Acceptance. Devotion and faith can elevate one’s consciousness by focusing on love, forgiveness, and trust – core emotional qualities of the higher levels. In fact, the ultimate teachings of most religions point toward love and peace: “Love the Lord your God… and your neighbor as yourself” is a prime directive in Christianity, and many spiritual traditions hold compassion as the highest virtue. When religious practice is rooted in fear or guilt, it reflects lower consciousness (e.g. fear of punishment corresponds to Hawkins’ Fear level ~100). But when it is rooted in love, it reflects higher consciousness (500+). At its best, spirituality guides one toward the level of Peace (600), characterized by bliss, unity, and an inner sense of perfection in existence. In these exalted states, religious frameworks converge with mystical experience – the individual feels connected with “All-Being” and finds meaning in oneness with the divine. Thus, religious meaning-making can evolve from motivating basic moral behavior at lower levels, up through inspiring altruistic love, and ultimately to facilitating transcendent peace and enlightenment.

Emotional Balance and Progression 

​Across all these stages, emotional balance is the key to moving upward. Hawkins’ Map essentially charts a rise from disempowering feelings (shame, guilt, fear, anger) to empowering emotions (courage, acceptance, love, joy). Progress requires recognizing and neutralizing negative emotions so they no longer dominate one’s mindset. For example, someone in the grip of fear and apathy (low levels) sees life as hopeless or frightening (David R. Hawkins: Tietoisuuden tasoista / Map of Consciousness | Katrina Lumikallio), often finding no meaning at all. To climb out of this, one must cultivate courage and hope – “even though you fear things you still act and move forward”. At Courage (200), a person still experiences fear or doubt, but now has the strength to face challenges without being paralyzed. Each step upward brings greater emotional resilience: by Neutrality (250) one achieves a calm detachment and “live and let live” attitude (Levels of Consciousness by David R. Hawkins - Mindfulled | Luka Boenisch); by Acceptance (350), one attains “emotional calm, self-discipline, and mastery”. This emotional stability allows for a broader, more positive view of life’s possibilities. In short, balancing and healing our emotions is what propels us through the levels of consciousness. When anger gives way to forgiveness, when pride yields to humility, and when fear is replaced by love, our understanding of life’s meaning deepens accordingly. Inner emotional transformation is thus the engine of spiritual evolution – by resolving inner turmoil and fostering peace within, we naturally align with higher truths and purposes.

Transcending All Models: Life as Pure Being  

​At the highest levels of consciousness, one finally transcends all conceptual frameworks and external quests for meaning. Enlightenment (700+) on Hawkins’ scale represents a state of pure awareness in which the usual distinctions fall away. The life-view at Enlightenment is simply “Is” (David R. Hawkins: Tietoisuuden tasoista / Map of Consciousness | Katrina Lumikallio) – a direct experiencing of reality as pure being. In this state, the meaning of life is selfevident and beyond intellectual explanation. One realizes, as mystics and sages have across cultures, that life’s ultimate meaning is life itself. When consciousness reaches this summit, the question “What is the meaning of life?” ceases to need an answer. Psychologists note a similar insight: when an individual is fully engaged in living, the very question of life’s meaning “evaporates” (Meaning of life - Wikipedia) – it drops away because life is no longer an abstract problem, but a lived reality of wholeness. Alan Watts captured this revelation succinctly when he said, “The meaning of life is just to be alive. It is so plain and so obvious and so simple.” (Alan Watts quotes that will change your perspective on life - Big Think). At enlightened consciousness, one simply is, without striving to justify existence through mental models or future goals. This doesn’t negate the value of the philosophical, scientific, or religious paths we travel; rather, it fulfills them. All those frameworks are like rungs on a ladder—useful until one reaches the top. Achieving higher consciousness means outgrowing the need for any single explanatory model, because one directly perceives the unity and intrinsic value of life. In the end, the evolution of consciousness reveals that the “meaning” of life was never something outside of us to be found – it emerges from within us as we grow. And at the pinnacle, we discover the profound truth that life is the meaning. Living fully, with love and awareness, is the purpose and the reward, all at once. Each stage of understanding, from existential struggle to scientific reasoning to humanistic love, has been a step on the path toward this simple, transcendent realization: the meaning of life is nothing beyond life – it is *life, experienced in the here and now*.

Sources: 

Read Next
AI-Powered Insights: Comparing the Transformationeer® Framework and Traditional Executive Coaching for Lasting Change.